This is the personal blog of Joseph Miner regarding the Remax All Cities
Realty Federal and State lawsuits. The blog is posted to keep interested parties
up to date on the day to day proceedings of this contentious real estate related
trademark litigation. This is the David v. Goliath story of a small real estate
company with a registered Federal Trademark battling the WORLDS third largest
Re/Max Franchise who decided to seize the registered Federal Trademark owned by
ALL CITIES REALTY, INC. > ALL CITIES REALTY
®
Certainly there are two sides to every story. This is
my side of this
story and my opinion of the issues, the players, the interesting
history of the Re/Max players, and the twists and turns of battling one of
Re/Max International's largest franchisees for more the SIX YEARS. I believe
everything written here, if stated as fact, is 100% accurate, and if not stated
as fact it is generally commentary or opinion of Joseph Miner. Most of the FACTS
are backed up by public documents which can be downloaded. If you note ANYTHING
that is stated as a FACT that is not accurate, please inform me and I will
remove after investigation.
Welcome to my blog!
A note about FREE SPEECH.
We do have FREE SPEECH in the United States of America.Additional information about free speech is available through a
multiplicity of organizations. You may start here and read about your rights as
protected under the law and the First Amendment [link].
The Supreme Court ruled in
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
418 U.S. 323 (1974), opinions could not be considered defamatory.
It is thus permissible to suggest, for instance, that someone is a bad
lawyer, but not permissible to falsely declare that the lawyer is ignorant
of the law: the former constitutes a statement of values, but the latter is a
statement alleging a fact. [cite wikipedia]
Defendant agents settlement phase
2
ends soon, 2010
Commbroker / Hollymax defendant agents must settle by March 31, 2010
Search the remaxlawsuits site
Comment added August 21, 2010
NOTICE - Settlement site opens again shortly. THIS WILL BE
YOUR LAST CHANCE TO SETTLE PRIOR TO THE
OPENING OF THE LAWSUIT. Keep watch on the A2Z Settlement site for re-opening in
next few days. We will be opening the agent lawsuit in Superior court soon.
Note - all agents who have settled have been dismissed. To them the case is
over. If you were notified by some uninformed person you were only partially
dismissed, that was untrue. You were fully dismissed. If you have been dismissed
and your FULL NAME or a variation of your full name still appears on the HTML
code of the website and we have not had it removed. please cite the page and
location so we can remove it.
We abide by our contracts and have dismissed those who have settled and have
removed your name from the remaxlawsuits site.
Fax your request for removal to the A2Z Ventures fax number in your
settlement package.
Comment added July 23, 2010
Beware... it appears Melissa Barlow has taken Kelli Todd's place and is now
distributing false and misinformation. Again she is emailing agents with
completely false, mis-construed, mis-leading information which she herself does not
understand. this is confusing to the agents and frustrating to all of us.
Note - "partial" dismissals are given when an entire case is NOT dismissed
and only a part of it is. When 1 person is dismissed it is a partial dismissal.
Also.. court clerks do not all notate this information uniformly. All persons
who have SETTLED have been dismissed "with prejudice" (meaning completely,
forever with no-recourse).
Settlement process continues. Settlement site to re-open SHORTLY before we
re-open lawsuit.
*** Note - Judge Stotler reversed the dismissals on the Commbroker / Hollymax
case and we are proceeding with the default judgments.
Comment added June 22, 2010
Commbroker / Hollymax trial dates imposed by Judge Stotler yesterday
(there have been remax rumors this case was dismissed - sorry not true)
12/31/10
1/15/11
2/15/11
3/15/11
4/15/11
6/20/11
7/19/11
Discovery Cut off
Expert Disclosure/Report deadline
Expert Rebuttal Disclosure/Report deadline
Expert Discovery Cut off
Dispositive Motion filing deadline
Final Pretrial Conference
Federal Trial
Comment added June 04, 2010
A2Z settlement site closed on May 31, 2010. Thank you to all that have
SETTLED , the settlement process is underway. Stay tuned...
If you are a listed agent you must read the May 15th blog post...
We were sent an email authored by
Melissa Barlow
identifying herself as an agent of RE/MAX EXECS (the new broker
for most of the Re/Max Marquee Partners lawsuit agents who were left at Re/Max
Marquee partners after it filed bankruptcy). RE/MAX EXECS effectively took over
the failed company and purchased assets and took over the agents. We have data
showing Melissa Barlow worked at the Westchester location of
RE/MAX ALL CITIES REALTY and have her information, listings and data in our
files with her photos under our Trademark, including her bio, listings and other
information.
Apparently RE/MAX EXECS (successor broker to some of the 2000 agents who
are still in litigation) has become involved in the Trademark Litigation with the lead activist; an agent working out of their company location in Manhattan
Beach. After reading her latest email Ms. Barlow appears to be giving agents
legal advice speaking as an agent and representative for the RE/MAX EXECS
company.
Possibly RE/MAX EXECS will share in your liability when their in-house
agent, Ms. Barlow, who is giving you legal advice based on conjecture and speculation,
is proven to be incorrect. This is no surprise since Holly Thomas works at
RE/MAX EXECS too! Holly and Kelli put you in this situation and now two people
at RE/MAX EXECS continue the tradition of delivering bad information. We have
recent emails from both Holly and Melissa.
HERE IS THE LETTER FROM MELISSA BARLOW OF RE/MAX EXECS (Palos Verdes /
Torrance / Manhattan Beach area of the South Bay)
From: Melissa Barlow [mailto:melissaXXXXXX@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:31 AM
To: MelissaXXXXXX@aol.com
Subject: AIC - Lawsuit Update
Hello All,
I apologize in advance for the lengthy email but I have much to touch
upon. Please read through my email before you open the attachments so
that you know what information they reflect.
*Meetings Next Week*
Again we have an individual spewing venom in her emails based on opinion,
guesses and just bad information. Unfortunately Ms. Barlow is completely off
base in much of her information to the agents. Much of the information she is
passing about is purely conjecture or speculative and other information is
simply wrong - yet she places the information in her emails as being correct.
Ms. Barlow is making statements in her emails to the agents as though she is an
attorney; statements we know to be false and we can prove to be false. Please
beware of this person who is leading your group and giving you
false information... this is NO DIFFERENT and simply another Kelli Todd.
When strong emotion blocks simple logic people get in trouble. This
happened with Kelli Todd. It appears Ms. Barlow worked at probably the most
obvious infringing office; the flagship ALL CITIES REALTY office in Westchester
- completely built around the new umbrella name ALL CITIES REALTY. This office
had ALL CITIES REALTY signs all around the building, a DBA as ALL CITIES REALTY,
business cards with ALL CITIES REALTY and many web pages using the mark ALL
CITIES REALTY. While emotion won't let them say I used the mark ALL CITIES
REALTY, they walked in and out of their office with the ALL CITIES REALTY logo
all day long month after month. They point to the building and say "that's where
I work", they bring their clients to the building to sign documents. Now if Ms.
Barlow STILL believes she did not infringe on the State and Federal Trademarks
All Cities Realty... what can we say?
Its kind of like fighting the ticket you receive when getting caught with
a red light camera... the police send you a photo of your face while you are
driving your car through the middle of an intersection with the traffic lights
red on both sides... you show up in court. The prosecutor shows this evidence to
the Judge and you get up and tell the judge you are not guilty? If you have ever
sat in a courtroom you hear the laughter and the snickering in these situations.
This time around, FOR YOUR OWN PROTECTION, be sure you can collect your
wasted time and funds from Ms. Barlow (or possibly RE/MAX EXECS) if in the end
you feel she, as a representative of RE/MAX EXECS, leads you astray in this
lawsuit and what she tells you was: 1) incorrect 2) false 3) misleading 4) legal
advice, and 5) purely speculative based on only a tiny bit of information she
located.. this is simply another emotional Pied Piper from Remaxville leading you into a BIG
mistake that will be costly and time consuming.... in the end, after you have
lost the opportunity to SETTLE, lost 1000s of dollars and lost months or years
of your time... she will say she was sorry.
Kelli Todd did EXACTLY the same thing citing all this same garbage with
Holly Thomas: 1) the case has no merit 2) they won't be able to prove damages 3)
there is no case law on this etc. etc. etc. All while they spent $1,400,000 in legal fees and lost virtually EVERY
motion along the way.... in the end Federal Judge Stotler stated that all agents
should stand trial. Kelli said the SAME exact things in her emails to the agents
as Ms. Barlow now recites.... Kelli lost $1,400,000 and her entire company;
what will you lose as you follow Ms. Barlow? Make certain SHE is
responsible financially for what you lose in time and money. If you base
your decisions on HER false information or speculative conjecture... make
certain she is responsible at the end of the lawsuit road.
Unfortunately LAWYERS tell you things like this before they take your case
to defend you... they say "oh that case has no merit" or "there is no case law"
or "we can bankrupt them so you won't have to pay" ...
they say whatever they need to for you to say OK here is my money please defend
me. Has Melissa Barlow presented the 10,000 web pages we have and the 20
GIGABYTES of photos, data, business cards, flyers etc. to this lawyer??? NO!
Believe me this lawyer has not taken 10 or 20 hours of their own time to review
the evidence before consulting Ms. Barlow.
Kelli Todd fell for that.... look what has happened - her lawyer is now a partner in his firm with a
$1,400,000 pay day... and Kelli Todd bankrupted her THREE companies and lost it all. Our
inside sources tell us Kelli's lawyer was sending her letters for a $10,000 PAYMENT every
week - if you don't pay I will remove myself from the case! What were her
options? To continue to pay and not pay her other bills.... the same thing will
happen to YOU! Again,
when strong emotion blocks simple logic people get in trouble. So if you chose
to take the defense route remember these words... you can climb in that hole,
but you can't climb out. So... after your hire the lawyer and when the lawyer
asks for more money and more money and more money, because the case has taken
much more time then they calculated... what will you do? If you don't pay you
will have no lawyer... what will you do?
We are sad that an emotional activist from RE/MAX EXECS is leading the charge to
fight the trademark infringement claims is again giving the agents false
information. Apparently RE/MAX EXECS has now entered the fight after we were told by
their owners and their own counsel at a luncheon they would not be involved.
While we could refute Ms. Barlow's information paragraph by paragraph... we have
decided that if she is going to give the agents at RE/MAX EXECS and other agents
more false and speculative information then its simply better for us! Ms. Barlow
fails to inform the agents about all the other infringement factors that they
have not addressed and again we have a new set of agents not knowing the whole
story, not having all the data, and not having all the evidence.
While we have several of her past emails (because they are being sent to
us), it was finally time and important to note this email as it was shared with
us by JonSETTLED(a former agent) who SETTLED yet sent to Ms. Barlow completely
FALSE statements about the settlement process and our agreement. I sent Ms.
Barlow Mr. SETTLED's signed settlement agreement for her inspection showing her
that his statements in his email to her were completely false. Its sad that we
must continue to put out all the lie-fires after all the agents have been
through. While Ms. Barlow states in her emails to the agents there is NO case
law on agents and Independent Contractors... that is completely FALSE; we have
significant case law on this!
What is Ms. Barlow going to tell you all when you have spent $1,000s of
dollars in legal fees and discovery costs, you have lost your motions, you have
wasted 100s of hours of your time and our settlement fees rise significantly and
she was wrong? I'm sorry... Yes she will tell you she is SORRY just like Kelli
did in her last letter to the agents. And once again you will be SOL... lots of
wasted money and lots of wasted time.
Please remember, when you engage an attorney, that attorney is working to
MAKE MONEY not to do your case for free. Every hour burned up in your
litigation, chat, meetings, questions, answers, reviewing discovery for you will
be billed to you. Each agent will have their own discovery, their own questions
to answer, and their own documents to produce. The attorney then must review all
this information agent by agent or risk malpractice. Ask your potential attorney
about this and the costs of discovery.
One last thing... ask them to put in writing that you will win your case,
that you will be dismissed, or that you will win a summary judgment. Tell your
new lawyer that you will pay then only if they you win! When you
get a bill for more than you could have SETTLED for - please remember we
educated you about this. You can settle for less than your attorney will cost
and we have done our best to make this obvious. Ask your potential attorney to
give you in writing the MAXIMUM they will charge you personally for attorney
time, research, paralegal time, copying, mailing, postage, filing and so forth.
Get the maximum cost from your new lawyer in writing so you are not surprised when you get
your $10,000, $100,000, or $1,000,000 bill.
Take 5 minutes and read the letter below.
Kelli admits she did not know what she was doing, she "claims" she got bad
information and babbles on about "she thought" the trademark was in front -
APPARENTLY SHE NEVER READ HER OWN REMAX TRADEMARK MANUAL. This letter is clearly
an admission of guilt... and a BIG I'm sorry.
I would urge the agents to think this through again - don't be led astray
by a realtor-nurse making emotional decisions and giving you false information.
At the request of prior management we have kept the settlement site open to the
end of the month at the same $2500 rate. If you chose to settle you may go to
the site and register. There will be NO further discount or negotiation in
settlement levels.
Comment added April 27, 2010
Possibly this is a clearer version of the issues alleged in the legal
actions. This is the Commbroker Second Amended Complaint that was filed in late
2009. This is more specific. This more detailed information will be integrated
into the State lawsuit. Please download and read to educate yourself.
Note there are many more agents to be named
in the Remax / Commbroker / Hollymax / All Cities Realty cases - the
trademark use was continued following the filing initial lawsuits. If you worked
at Re/Max Marquee Partners, Inc. (CF Real Estate Loans) from August 2002 to about December 2007 this
will apply to you. Commbroker was longer - until it filed bankruptcy about
1/22/2009. Exact dates will be established. Also if you used personal websites
with All Cities Realty that will be an issue too.
Notice - the attorney that was representing you has withdrawn from the
case.
Several of these people below have not been notified per the attorney
David Sandelands' declaration. If you know any of the
people named below please notify them of this important due date! Funny,
he did not try to find them too hard... they are all listed on the DRE website.
By the way you were NEVER represented in 1700 person lawsuit. That was
just another lie. An attorney was NEVER hired to represent you to our
knowledge... Truthfully, as sad as it is you were never told the truth.
Answers to the legal complaint are due by April 1,
2010 in Federal Count for the following:
HOLLYMAX REALTY, INC., a California corporation - DEFAULT
JUDGMENT,
COMMBROKER, INC. a California
corporation - STILL IN BANKRUPTCY,
KENNETH G. SETTLED,
FARZAD ANDY DORRANI,
ALLEN JACKSON - DEFAULT JUDGMENT,
ARIANNE KAYS - DEFAULT JUDGMENT,
JEANETTTE SETTLED,
(JULIA) JIAO HONG SETTLED,
ROB SETTLED,
SHANNAN SETTLED,
COLETTE STEVENS - DEFAULT JUDGMENT,
SUSAN SETTLED,
OMID SETTLED,
GLEN SETTLED,
MAURICE SETTLED,
NINA SETTLED,
MATTHEW SETTLED,
JACK KHALILI,
JIHAN KIM,
ROBERT SETTLED,
GINA SETTLED,
SIMON SHAHERI - DEFAULT JUDGMENT,
BYRON SETTLED,
DALE SETTLED,
Watch for our settlement offer website coming soon. The site will provide
a complete history of the lawsuits, a possibly a forum, FAQ, hard proof of everything we
say, and various methods to put this all behind you.
We hear Re/Max Marquee Partners is planning a town hall meeting. These
people offering to answer questions is not the issue. Its the answers they give
you that will be the problem. You will need to FACT CHECK each and every
answer that you hear.
For example: you were offered indemnification.
First, just the filing fee for complex litigation is $525 per person. 1700 X
$525 = $892,500 (in one day!). Our opinion is the company never had the money
to pay even the first appearance fee. On top of that would have been lawyers
fees maybe $1,000,000-$2,000,000. We tried time after time to have the court
question where the money was coming from to pay the filing fee.. we were
unsuccessful.
It was much easier to get you to believe she would pay all the costs and
then to prolong the trial as long as possible (which they did). We were told years ago that the plan was to file
bankruptcy at the last moment prior to trial (which would have happened because
trial was to be in February except for the fact our expert got sick which forced
a continuation but the BK was filed anyway. It would have been irresponsible to tell you that
we heard these rumors a long time ago.
We wanted you to ask the question and find out your on your own.
Do yourself one last favor. We have been telling you the truth for five
years. Fact check, from non Re/Max Marquee Partners sources, what they tell you
in the town hall meeting. Be certain they have authentic documents that PROVE
what they say is true. And then fact check the documents. Take nothing at face
value.
In just the last week a barrage of misleading statements have been sent
out to the agents in letters and emails... but that is nothing new as practically
nothing we have been told for the past 5 years has been 100% accurate.... its a never ending process to
investigate and correct all the false and misleading
statements made by Re/Max Marquee Partners and their representatives. Here are
just a few recent issues:
Example - They recently stated WE delayed trial time after time (they
did)
This could not be more simple - you folks are in the real estate business; just because someone tells you they are
telling you the truth - does not mean they are telling you the truth. Fact check
everything! Do not take one statement from these people as fact - do your
research and fact check everything. That is what court is all about - facts.
We have not done anything except protect the company's trademark. We have
simply protected the trademark - the exact same thing REMAX has done time after
time in court. 100s if not 1000s of times REMAX has sued for protection of their
trademark and the mark has NOT even been similar let alone identical.
NOTE that Re/Max ALL CITIES REALTY and ALL CITIES REALTY are virtually
identical and we have more than ample evidence of confusion because of the
almost identical trade names.
Please don't forget I never asked for a penny when this all started. I
simply asked that this company stop using the ALL CITIES REALTY®
federal trademark. It was your
leader who escalated this entire situation by refusing to release the ALL CITIES
REALTY trademark
(I wonder if she [anyone there] had ever read the Re/Max trademark manual?). She told you to
continue to use the mark and that is what happened. This is simply business and
this situation has cost All Cities Realty significant time, money and losses
over the past 8+/- years.
Its sad that people like this can purposely hurt the Re/Max brand so
much... I guess one rogue franchisee could do that to any company. Re/max itself
is a good company and they put out a very informative trademark manual for their
franchisees and for their agents - if Kelli or her associates had read the
trademark manual this most likely would not have happened. You can give them the
manual... but you can't force them to read it, or follow it.
I would suggest ALL AGENTS read Re/Max's own trademark manual. It will
keep you out of trouble.
Photo of service of 800+/- services to Re/Max All Cities Realty.
Photo1Photo2Agent for service Note that the
other services of process were made by other means. The
list of agents served is correct and all
agents on this list were properly served. See photos. We have proofs of service
for each and every person on the agents served list whether management wants to
accurately communicate this to you or not. After all for the past FOUR years
management also communicated and guaranteed to you that you were indemnified.
Gina Smearer [in house paralegal assistant to DaleSETTLEDand Holly
Thomas] accepted ALL services. Photo of boxes of complaints served upon
agents at Re/Max main office. Photo of process server taking boxes into Re/Max.
Its helpful to have photos of everything today to make a point and to
prove what you say is the truth. Words are simply words without proof. We have
proof. Please read the blog below for the issues. Please understand we are NOT
flapping our lips in the wind... we have proof of every word we state. Don't you
just hate people who can't tell the truth? Boxes full of summons and complaints
were served properly - not 12.
Again, thank you for those who have contacted us and wish to resolve this
issue. To the others please look at our proof and then decide. We told you this
would happen way back in 2006.
I have decided to take blog holiday. Re/Max
Marquee Partners is in bankruptcy. The assets will either be sold in chapter 11
or the company will be liquidated in chapter 7. We have not fabricated any
stories on the blog... simply the truth. No sense in bantering with people who
don't tell the truth and will make up any story to try to make their agents like
them. Take the service of process for example... photos and 800 envelopes going
into Re/Max tell the story... people can make up any story they wish to try and
change people's opinion.
We base our statements on fact (and photos). We have all Kelli's emails,
letters, etc... filled with unsubstantiated statements (you want to believe) to
make you feel better and keep you confused.
Take a look at the bankruptcy filing
- Take a good look - common sense will tell you we did not bankrupt the company!
That is just a PARTIAL debt list - wait till the whole thing comes out! The
management bankrupted the company (long ago). But if they want to blame it on
us... ok.
If you wish more information you will need to join the newsletters.
We wish to thank those of you who have quickly reached out to us and would
like to put this behind you. While we will be continuing our efforts towards
litigation, and the bankruptcy of RMP is just another speed bump, we had hoped
this would end years ago by simply complying with our demands way back in 2003.
[any logical, ethical, and moral person would have immediately acknowledged the
issues]
If you too would like to put this in the past please email us or subscribe
to one of newsletter announcement lists regarding our upcoming formal settlement
proposal.
Formal settlement to be offered soon - please read and pass
information on to your associate
agents.
Subscribe to our two newsletters. We will be
offering updated information on the trials and settlement information.
If you wish to contact us (not rant) regarding our forth coming
offer to settle please send an email to:
settle@remaxlawsuits.com
Without warning to current and former agents Re/Max
Marquee Partners, Inc. went BANKRUPT. The assets are being sold. The
company is history and will vanish. Indemnification previously offered by Kelli
Todd and the company is worthless (we told you this a long time ago). Its our
understanding you have no attorney representing you.
Kelli Todd blames everyone but herself in the letters to the agents. In
her own words she says she had bad advice. She also gave you bad advice.
Deciphering that statement she admits guilt as to the infringement because of
that bad advice. I didn't have an attorney and I did not need any advice to know
the law - that is part of the job as the CEO, you must wear many hats. Read the
letters put out by RMP.
An analogy is simple. Kelli Todd tells you to get into your car and follow
her. Kelli Todd then starts going 85 mph on the freeway. A highway patrol pulls
you both over and cites you both for speeding. You tell the officer "I was just
following Kelli, she said it was OK to go 85", the officer then gives you your
$1000 speeding ticket. You go to court and tell the Judge, "Kelli told me it was
ok"; the judge issues the $1000 fine.
Rather than fixing the problem and settling Holly Thomas is suggesting
'clever' methods to prolong the end result; a guilty verdict. Kelli and Holly
put you where you are today. Think about that.
What Holly Thomas
fails to tell you is that 800+ summons and complaints were delivered and
ACCEPTED by Gina Smearer at the main offices of the company (did they tell
you?). You, the agents, have been properly served and we have the paperwork to
prove it. If they did not tell you - their actions were highly unethical and
possibly you should contact the
California State
Bar to file a
attorney complaint if the RMP legal department held back the paperwork after
we served you - possibly that attorney who did that has some responsibility. If
you would like a photo of the 800+ summons being wheeled into the main offices
we can provide that to you as proof as well as the proofs of service filed by
the process server. Please call the legal department and ask
for a detailed written explanation as to why they would not deliver your summons and compliant.
You might want to contact the State Bar on the legal advice you have received
regarding the worthless indemnifications that were pushed on you - its my
opinion the person who convinced you to take those indemnification agreements was not acting in your best
interest - they were acting in Kelli Todd's and Re/Max Marquee Partners' best
interest. This was a conflict of interest. This is just my opinion and I am not
a lawyer.
We disagree with many "suggestions" you have received from your
management. It is our opinion your management team has been HIGHLY UNETHICAL
during this entire situation. If you read the bankruptcy filing the company
debts are astronomical (our debt is not even listed) - it was not our lawsuit
that made this company fail - it was the POOR MANAGEMENT AND BAD DECISIONS. Read
the bankruptcy filing - this company owes millions and
millions and millions of dollars - so much money I had to gasp for air.
This does not change the Trademark infringement. Trademark infringement
continues to exist today and is spread over the Internet. The corporate
Infringement dates vary. Re/Max Marquee Partners, Inc. (formally Re/Max All
Cities Realty) infringed on our mark from August 2002 to approximately December
2007, The Commbroker site I believe was longer. We will name every agent who was
a party to the infringement when the case re-opens.
In the meantime we will be offering a settlement to all agents. The cost
of settlement will be far less than the typical retainer cost of most attorneys
and if you choose to settle the entire situation will be behind you. Kelli Todd
suggests that this lawsuit bankrupted her. I would hope you won't follow her
direction any longer; she has led you down the garden path then over a cliff.
Its our understanding that you may be dismissed during the stay. Note -
all Trademark claims are alleged claims.
I apologize for this organization giving you such bad and misleading
information.
(if it interests you - we are not
affiliated with this site)
Comment added
February 16-17, 2010
(my reaction to the recent letters sent to the agents from Holly Thomas and
Kelli Todd stating bankruptcy is being filed)
I am sorry Ms. Todd and Ms. Thomas but I disagree with your statements of
'fact'. Even in bankruptcy you can still afford gas for your BS propaganda
machine - you folks just can't tell the truth even on your Corporate death bed.
Here is just one example of YOUR many requests for trial and other related
lawsuit continuances. Although your expert knew and was well advised of the
trial date for months prior to trial she somehow could not make the date [note
the she was not sick, she just could not make it]. Federal Judges do not
generally continue a trial for weeks. When you ask for a week... you get 6
months. Download Defendants' request
for continuance by David Sandelands. If the agents want to view all YOUR
requested continuances they will need to view the court files.... but there are
plenty by your side. Don't blame us for any of this.
While you state in your letters to the agents there has been no
confusion... We have scores of phone calls and OVER 2000 emails sent to us in
error. There is plenty of actual confusion and you knew it.
Additionally, months ago, we had been notified Re/Max Marquee Partners was
going to claim bankruptcy before trial... so from our perspective your comments
and excuses are all show. Your side had planned bankruptcy all along.
Let's face the facts... the letters put our by Re/Max Marquee Partners are
pure propaganda with little fact and lots of puff. These letters simply tell the
agents what you would like them to believe; NOT THE FACTS or the TRUTH.
EVERYTHING is truthful in this blog - apparently one DATE
that I posted a comment is the only example Holly Thomas can give as an example
of my "untruths" (sometimes it just easier to put additional thoughts
regarding a subject under the same date).
That has been the problem all along. I have been telling your
agents the truth from day one of this website. While I am not going to continue
to argue your untruths here (I don't have 40 hours to list them all)... the
facts are not as you state - you both know it, I know it, and the court will
know it and the jury will get it. And when we are done... all the agents will
know it too. Your version of the "facts" are just pure propaganda, completely
untrue; simply said - a story a defense attorney would make up.
The facts are these
I obtained the name ALL CITIES REALTY in the mid 1990s
I purchased the domain name and trademarked the name (because its a
great name and I could)
I did EXACTLY what a business owner is legally supposed to do to
protect my business
My company was at a point we could significantly expand - we were #1 on
the net for many searches
Kelli Todd decided to take the name even though they knew [in advance]
it was taken
I emailed Kelli and others there shortly after she took the name -
telling her it was trademarked (2003)
I then sent a cease and desist letter from my attorney (now a superior
court judge)
I then sent a second cease and desist letter from a second attorney
I asked that Kelli Todd simply give up name -
I did NOT ask for a single dollar - NOT ONE DOLLAR!
Kelli refused to give up the name starting with my companies many
requests as far back as 2003
Then with the agents help everyone proceeded to place more than 20,000
pages on the Internet using All Cities Realty
The result of all the pages, the personal websites, the search engine
ranking and links completely devastated ACR
The facts are we do business in Los Angeles and Re/Max does business in
Orange County - I have brokers in Los Angeles
I had lots and lots of money ready to expand my business model, but
then was forced to stop and spend money on a lawsuit
Re/Max and the Agents' continued use of the ALL CITIES REALTY name destroyed our business
Kelli then spent $1,000,000 with her lawyer (huge waste of money -
instead of settling for much less and simply changing the name)
Then, on advice of her lawyer, Kelli finally changed the name anyway!
(why - if she was not doing anything wrong?)
She ran her own (Dad's) company smack into the ground over the name
CEOs are suppose to overrule the attorney - they are to use their own
good judgment (and experience)
She wanted the names so bad she not only took All Cities Realty, she
also took All Cities Escrow
Kelli Todd, if you notice, STILL does not take
responsibility for anything! It was everyone else's fault!
Please read between the lines of Kelli Todd's and Holly's letters. Her
letters are simply garbage propaganda
I chose a great name and had a great business model
Kelli Todd wanted the name, hijacked it and after years of a foolish
costly battle - finally lost - its just that simple
---- Other LAWSUIT FACTS
Kelli Todd and her associates received both emails and two cease and
desist letters starting in 2003!
We showed her that we had a FEDERAL TRADMARK... she continued to seize the name
(Dr. Stockwell got sick, Kelli went bankrupt in the same amount of time
- things happen)
The lawsuit was continued SEVERAL TIMES by her own attorney! Why does
she not mention that?
Her attorney has ABANDONED the Commbroker case and the agents - she
fails to mention that too!
Kelli Todd originally DISCLAIMED
responsibility for her own agents - this is why they were sued - she
missed that one too!
Kelli and Holly write letters full of mis-statements and un-truths to
appease you... not to get you any factual information
Kelli's OWN REMAX TRADEMARK MANUAL tells everyone
to conduct a TRADEMARK SEARCH before you choose a trade name!
(Kelli is RUNNING the business... its not Remax's
job to advise Kelli on the "basics" of business operation (trade names)
(she seems to leave out many of the important facts as CEO while
running one of the world's largest Re/Max franchises)
---- Other KELLI FACTS
"Kelli has put everything
she owns back into RMP" > DON'T BELIEVE THIS!
This is the "I don't have anything left, please don't sue me paragraph.
Notice she is NOT filing personal bankruptcy!!!
If she has nothing and deep in personal debt - why not?
What about ALL CITIES ESCROW? Who owns that?
Does she own any part of any company in Canada with or without Lorne
Wallace?
How about any other corporations she owns; in California, in the US, in
CANADA?
Kelli just deeded 1/2 the house her and her dad owned Playa Del Rey - back
to him! ($1,000,000?)
What happened to the $1,000,000+ house in Lake Arrowhead and that money?
How about the "sale" of the Lake Arrowhead offices... that is an
interesting sale
What about the money from the sale of the $1,000,000+ Palm Desert
house?
Where is all Kelli's money... we are guessing there is more... much
more.
---- Moral TO THIS STORY
What is the moral to this story?
Before
you take something from someone, you better know who they are; they might go
to battle
Before
you engage in battle, you better know your opponent - "art of war"
When you
do something wrong - just admit it, fix it quickly, get it over with, and move
on with your life
Lawsuits
and attorneys are a big waste of time and huge waste of money. Its all
negative energy - even if you win.
*These are my personal opinions and my version of the facts - we do have
evidence to back up what we write.
Comment added
February 13, 2010
Has ALL CITIES REALTY
®
forced one of the world's largest Re/Max franchises to turn their tail and RUN?
More as the story develops......... its the tale of David v. Goliath.
You better call a lawyer TODAY! That is my opinion...
Comment added
January 27 and February 10, 2010
You better call a lawyer TODAY! That is my opinion... its always good to
consult a lawyer.
What happens if...
Kelli Todd files bankruptcy?
Or the business Re/Max Marquee Partners files bankruptcy?
Kelli SELLS the business assets to another Re/Max?
We have heard rumors this week - if you have information give us a call
800-738-2583.
WHAT HAPPENS THEN???? Are you covered?
No... we
immediately file against the 1700 agents!
You better call your own lawyer TODAY and ask some questions!
Here is David
Sandelands withdrawal declaration(4.5 meg. 171 pages) - apparently
he NEVER even talks directly to the people he was representing - and does NOT
even know where all his clients are living!!! Now that is funny...!
( if it were me I would be talking directly to the
lawyer who my boss claimed was representing me! )
Our research, and recent phone calls, shows that many of the agents have been led astray by Re/Max
Marquee Partners' in-house propaganda super BS machine. Look at the history of
these people before you fall for the "story" they will tell you (do you think 'her'
lawyer is going to tell you the truth) be serious.... There is no requirement
for any lawyer to tell the truth.. especially a defense lawyer. Its a defense
lawyer's job to
"make up a good story" that sounds good and to get the defendant off. Remember that line... "if the
glove don't fit you must acquit". Don't listen to the BS machine.. do your
own research and read the lawsuit.
Before you pass judgment on this case be sure you know the truth - not
propaganda. When we get this to court all that propaganda that you were told won't be
worth 2 cents. Anyone who is affected here should look into the "real" reason
this attorney is bailing out before trial... see below and download the "I need
to get out of this lawsuit" document.
Do you believe that you have a lawyer representing you the 1700 agent
lawsuit? In the Hollymax / Commbroker lawsuit?
Do YOU personally have in your possession a legal binding signed contract
with your name on it on paper in YOUR HAND from a law
firm that is representing you? Does it state that Kelli Todd is going to pay your legal
bill - whatever the cost?
Let me answer for you... No you do not!!! Repeat to
this.... I do not have a contract in my hand FROM A LAW
FIRM that states Kelli Todd will defend
me [indemnify me] and pay for my legal bills for the Trademark Trial[s].
Repeat this too... I do not have a contract in my and with my name on it
that Kelli Todd will pay all the damages [money] that will need to be paid when
[if] we are found guilty of Federal Trademark infringement.
If you don't have a multi page CONTRACT WITH YOUR
NAME identified in the contract FROM A "REAL" LAW
FIRM (not the in-house attorney) stating that Kelli Todd is paying for your
$100,000 legal defense from a law firm with your name on it and and Kelli Todd's
signature at the bottom stating she "PERSONALLY GUARANTEES PAYMENT" and when and
if she moves to CANADA you can still collect... let me tell you - you have nothing...
Time to ask Kelli for YOUR contract from a LAW FIRM before something un-thinkable
happens.... maybe you should demand it since all of you signed those
worthless indemnification agreements.
What now.. will the RE/MAX attorney be dumping all Kelli's cases and the 1700 agents?
If he has a conflict with these agents then
he must have a conflict with the 1700 agent case as the same agents are
involved!
Time to ask Kelli Todd who will be
representing you in the 1700 agent case.... don't say we did not warn you!
We smell dead fish - a 300 pound flounder....
what will the agents do now?
Comment added
January 22, 2010
Hollymax / Commbroker lawsuit news
Federal Judge Stotler rules on Hollymax motion to dismiss... sorry Remax
you lose... so far everyone listed below is in for the trial.
(wouldn't you know it.. Kelly Todd gets her Alter Ego claim dismissed...
somehow we will re-file)
So far everyone listed below is in for the trial.
Download and read this document...
Judge
Stotler's ruling on motion to
dismiss. It does not get more clear than this. Regarding -
HOLLYMAX REALTY, INC., a California corporation, COMMBROKER, INC. a California
corporation; KENNETH G. SETTLED, FARZAD ANDY DORRANI, ALLEN JACKSON, ARIANNE KAYS,
JEANETTTE SETTLED, (JULIA) JIAO HONG SETTLED, ROB O’SETTLED, SHANNAN
O’SETTLED, COLETTE STEVENS, SUSAN SETTLED, OMID BENJAMIN SETTLED, GLEN SETTLED,
MAURICE SETTLED, NINA SETTLED, MATTHEW SETTLED, JACK KHALILI, JIHAN KIM, ROBERT
SETTLED, GINA SETTLED, SIMON SHAHERI, BYRON SETTLED, JR., DALE A. SETTLED
Big big big big big news coming soon.... stay tuned!
Comment added
January 20, 2010
Re/Max Marquee Partners Trial continued... sometime later this year.
Agent count - 1/20/2010 - up to 171... one agent gained!
Comment added
January 10, 2010
Agent count - 1/10/2010 - down to 170... more agents leaving.
HISTORY
MAKING!!! REMAX MARQUEE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES REAL ESTATE TRADEMARK TRIAL
IN FEBRUARY 2010!
*IMPORTANT NOTE - I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY. CONSULT YOUR
ATTORNEY REGARDING THESE ISSUES AND HOW THEY COULD AFFECT YOU AND YOUR PENDING
COMMISSIONS IF REMAX MARQUEE PARTNERS FILES BANKRUPTCY BEFORE OR AFTER TRIAL. I
WAS TOLD THIS IS KELLI TODD'S TRIAL STRATEGY - TO FILE BANKRUPTCY... SHE STARTED
WITH COMMBROKER AND SIMPLY MOVED HER AGENTS TO REMAX MARQUEE PARTNERS.
Comment added
January 1, 2010
Agent count - 1/1/2010 - down to 171... more agents leaving.
HISTORY
MAKING!!! REMAX MARQUEE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES REAL ESTATE TRADEMARK TRIAL IN
FEBRUARY 2010!
BIG NEWS! Commbroker (sub-company of Remax Marquee Partners) BANKRUPTCY
continues...
Remax's bankruptcy trustee claims all
commissions in pipeline belong to bankruptcy estate per Remax Independent
Contractor agreement!*
TIME
TO READ YOUR REMAX INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT!
WHO'S MONEY IS IT...... WHEN A
BANKRUPTCY IS FILED?
ITS THE BROKER'S MONEY BEFORE ITS THE AGENT'S!
Check with your former associates Kaye, Kahn, and Steve SETTLED...
$400,000 setting in an escrow account they can't touch...
NOTE - I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY. CONSULT YOUR
ATTORNEY REGARDING THESE ISSUES AND HOW THEY COULD AFFECT YOU AND YOUR PENDING
COMMISSIONS IF REMAX MARQUEE PARTNERS FILES BANKRUPTCY BEFORE OR AFTER TRIAL. I
WAS TOLD THIS IS KELLI TODD'S TRIAL STRATEGY - TO FILE BANKRUPTCY... SHE STARTED
WITH COMMBROKER AND SIMPLY MOVED HER AGENTS TO REMAX MARQUEE PARTNERS.
Comment added
November 25, 2009
Download and read this document...
Our reply to their motion to
dismiss. It does not get more clear than this. Regarding -
HOLLYMAX REALTY, INC., a California corporation, COMMBROKER, INC. a California
corporation; KENNETH G. SETTLED, FARZAD ANDY DORRANI, ALLEN JACKSON, ARIANNE KAYS,
JEANETTTE SETTLED, (JULIA) JIAO HONG SETTLED, ROB O’SETTLED, SHANNAN
O’SETTLED, COLETTE STEVENS, SUSAN SETTLED, OMID BENJAMIN SETTLED, GLEN SETTLED,
MAURICE SETTLED, NINA SETTLED, MATTHEW SETTLED, JACK KHALILI, JIHAN KIM, ROBERT
SETTLED, GINA SETTLED, SIMON SHAHERI, BYRON SETTLED, JR., DALE A. SETTLED, KELLI TODD-AMUNDSON aka KELLI TODD
Agent count - 11/2/2009 - down to 175... more agents leaving. Total 231
including associated brokers (estimated)
(No longer the largest Re/Max in Southern California) from 700 agents/brokers
down to 231 agents/brokers...
Why do you think so many people left this company?
We have had many requests for this complaint so we are making it easier to find.
Check on the legal complains page to download the State 1700 agent
complaint.
Please don't call us to request a copy of this lawsuit,
download the legal complaint from the page below. If you worked for this Remax
at the time of infringement your name will be on the list. Please contact your lawyer
if you would like more information, or contact
www.realestatelosangeles.com
and ask them for more information.
We have re-filed the Hollymax / Commbroker complaint and
clarified some of the legal issues. I believe this version is much clearer now why the
alleged are guilty of what we allege in the lawsuits. Good reading about the scheme that went
on. More information about the roles of Kelli Todd (Kelli Amundson), Dale
SETTLED, Esq. (the attorney), and Byron SETTLED.
If this concerns you, you should download it and
read it. These lawsuits are far from over.
Download> 2008
Second amended Hollymax Federal Complaint
against -
HOLLYMAX REALTY, INC., a California corporation, COMMBROKER, INC. a California
corporation; KENNETH G. SETTLED, FARZAD ANDY DORRANI, ALLEN JACKSON, ARIANNE KAYS,
JEANETTTE SETTLED, (JULIA) JIAO HONG SETTLED, ROB O’SETTLED, SHANNAN
O’SETTLED, COLETTE STEVENS, SUSAN SETTLED, OMID BENJAMIN SETTLED, GLEN SETTLED,
MAURICE SETTLED, NINA SETTLED, MATTHEW SETTLED, JACK KHALILI, JIHAN KIM, ROBERT
SETTLED, GINA SETTLED, SIMON SHAHERI, BYRON SETTLED, JR., DALE A. SETTLED, KELLI TODD-AMUNDSON aka KELLI TODD
Comment added
October 21, 2009
Interesting news! Our lawsuit against Hollymax,
Byron SETTLED, Dale Eleinak, Kelli Todd and the other 20 or so agents was
DISMISSED! Well not so fast... Judge Stotler did dismiss the lawsuit for
various minor issues but we are hard at work and will be re-filing in just a few
days with clarification. So its a short term win for the the other side... we
will re-file in just a few days and let you read it when we do.
Comment added
October 20, 2009
Agent count - 10/20/2009 - down to 178... total 235 including associated
brokers (estimated) more abandoning ship...
Commbroker bankruptcy continues to grind.... still
no attorney from Remax Marquee Partners or Commbroker defending them:
Eliott Kahn or StephenSETTLED- to help them retain their commissions...
Comment added
September 20, 2009
Agents don't even have remax appointed attorneys to defend them while
they are losing their commissions!
What is really interesting to me is that Kelli does not seem to be
defending her agents that are getting their money taken by the bankruptcy
trustee. I don't see where she has hired lawyers to defend these agents so they
can keep their due commissions. She files bankruptcy and the agents lose their
commissions...? I am sure SteveSETTLEDwas depending on his commission from
the sale is this big property. Sad that Kelli files bankruptcy for the
Commbroker company (who everyone thought was just part of her bigger company)
then moves the agents over to her other company (formally named Re/Max All
Cities Realty) and she does not defend the agents who are losing their HUGE
commissions. $100s of thousands of dollars I might add... all related to her own
pre-meditated bankruptcy filing which she told us she would do..... (from my
perspective.. if she anticipated filing bankruptcy, she should have told her
agents to get their deals closed and collect their money so they would not lose
their comissions!)
I am sure in
this market these agents can't afford an attorney to try and get their
commissions... another sad blow for the agents there! I guess we will wait and
see what happens as the Remax bankruptcy continues.
Notice of Continued Status Conference with proof of service Filed by
Trustee Edward M Wolkowitz (RE: related document(s)
10 Alias Summons Issued on 6767 Sunset Plaza, LLC Date Issued 8/25/2009,
Answer Due 9/24/2009; Reeve Benaron Date Issued 8/25/2009, Answer Due 9/24/2009;
First American Title Insurance Company Date Issued 8/25/2009, Answer Due
9/24/2009; Eliott Kahn Date Issued 8/25/2009, Answer Due 9/24/2009; Linda Kaye
Date Issued 8/25/2009, Answer Due 9/24/2009; StephenSETTLEDDate Issued 8/25/2009, Answer Due 9/24/2009; Stafford
Commercial Real Estate, Inc. A California Corporation Date Issued 8/25/2009,
Answer Due 9/24/2009). (Royzman, Natella) (Entered: 08/28/2009)
Comment added
September 3, 2009
Agent count - 9/3/2009 - down to 181... total 237 including associated
brokers (estimated) more abandoning ship...
Trustee continues lawsuit to seize about $300,000 in
agent's commissions... Judge approves trustee's appointed accountant.
Comment added
August
10, 2009
Agent count - 8/10/2009 - down to 181... total 240 including associated brokers
(estimated) - I think this may be 1995 levels for this company!
SCARY! - NEW
DEVELOPMENT - Apparently Bankruptcy Trustee does not trust the Commbroker
accounting, and taxes have not been filed. Trustee has put in a request now to
hire its own forensic account firm to go over the Commbroker accounting. Looks
like this simple bankruptcy is not going to be so simple. See below... Trustee
still going after agents' commissions. Getting interesting.
The three ALL CITIES REALTY® lawsuits linger... now continued until at least 2010 because of Kelli's attorney's court filing.
Comment added July
10, 2009
Agent count - 7/10/2009 - down to 184!!!
SCARY! - HUGE
$300,000 DEVELOPMENT in the Commbroker bankruptcy case!
The Bankruptcy Trustee seems to think that any commissions
that are due the company, in this case Re/Max Commercial Brokerage (or 90 days
prior to filing bankruptcy), BELONG TO THE BANKRUPTCY DEBTORS ESTATE! At least
that is how I interpret the complaint that was filed.
Download Here
What does this mean? This means, and its logical, that the Company
(broker) is entitled to all commissions that are incoming. First the commission
goes to the Broker who then pays the agents or associated broker per their
contract. The Trustee alleges that if the Company (Broker) files for bankruptcy,
as in this case, the bankruptcy estate is entitled to all that money from
incoming commissions and the agents are simply "unsecured creditors". This seems
correct and I am sure the Bankruptcy Trustee's attorney knows his stuff as they
are one of the biggest firms in LA...
What does this mean to real estate agents?
This means, at least it means to me, that if you have a commission in the
pipeline that closes 90 days prior to, or following a real estate companies
bankruptcy filing, that you may be left high and dry and your commission will
just become part of the Company's funds in bankruptcy. You will become a simple
creditor and get your itty bitty share of whatever is left after the bankruptcy
dust settles... its the Bankruptcy Trustee's job to get as much money into the
estate and to pay the creditors as possible. If you are an agent you work for
the broker. its the broker who gets the commission and in turn is obligated by
contract to give you a percentage. However, if someone like the IRS, FTB,
Bankruptcy Trustee grabs that commission while its in the brokers bank account,
it still, at that time, belongs to the broker. The only thing an agent can do is
sue the broker for the money or wait to get some of the money when the
Bankruptcy estate is split up.
You will need to talk to an attorney to get a better perspective of this.
Don't depend on my analysis here, I just read the Bankruptcy Trustee's
Attorney's complaint - you should contact your personal attorney for a thorough
review of what could happen when a company files for bankruptcy. It makes sense
to me, but I'm am not an attorney.
Example: Say you have been working on a deal for 6 months. It finally goes
into a 60 day escrow, your broker then files bankruptcy: if your deal closes
after that, while the broker is in bankruptcy, apparently your anticipated
commission is still the property of the broker and part of the bankruptcy
estate. Whoa! That could certainly lead to some sleepless nights!
I'm am sure there are a few former Re/Max Commercial Brokerage agents who
are not too happy to hear this news!
This may just be the first of many filings like this to come...
More agents willing to testify... I guess time is a good thing as
relationships change.
Comment added July
1, 2009
Agent count - 7/1/2009 - down to 187!!!
We are now preparing for the trial in September! Woohoo... It will be good
to get this over with (or at least the first part of this process). Its obvious
that our legal system is broke to have to wait to get justice this long. Its
extremely difficult on a small company under these circumstances. You are almost
being punished just for filing a lawsuit with the costs, the attorney fees, the
years of waiting, its a nightmare. This is how society has determined we settle
our differences today; it is what it is.
The good news is that we have many many people who have called us to give
us more information lately. We are also watching the Commbroker bankruptcy
closely... if appears that Kelli Todd can't get her Commbroker documents in to
the US Trustee... at least that is what it looks like to us. The Trustee has
been waiting for her books for months! its easy to state how much you made or
lost, but when someone wants to examine your books... that is when the truth
comes out - LINE BY LINE. Still waiting for those books and records...
Closing offices, spinning off offices...
Comment added June
1, 2009
Trial in September!!! Then we move on to the 1700
Re/Max agents named in the California State lawsuit.
Closing offices, spinning off offices... wow had 15 offices... now down to 5 offices.
700 agents/brokers to less than 250.
Commbroker Inc. bankruptcy should get really interesting soon!
We're watching closely.
***More agent losses!*** T
here are currently 191
Salespersons affiliated with this Re/Max Marquee Partners.
The bigger they are, the
harder they fall... look at GM.
Its probably good that the
offices were closed. We were told it was nothing but a sea of EMPTY DESKS!
Amazing losses! On March 25th Re/Max Marquee
Partners, Inc. showed 225 agents on the DRE website... today its 205...
this Re/Max has lost 20 real estate agents is just this
last 7 days! We've been counting on our fingers... it looks like this
company has lost about 400 agents (and brokers) since their high of about 688+/-
... down to 288+/- .... that is staggering! Pretty soon they will have just one
office ...because that's all they'll need.
Comment added March
28, 2009
This new Remax trademark lawsuit will give you some insight as to why our
lawsuit is a slam dunk. Remax has filed a lawsuit against some small real estate
brokerage back east. You have got to take a look at this! Remax apparently
believes there is a confusing similarity in these two logos... look for yourself
:) - its really a laugh out loud moment.
What this does show you is just how far Remax will go to protect their own
Trademark. The same reason why we are protecting ours.
Comment added March
24, 2009
Now we are dealing with the BANKRUPTCY of Re/Max
Marquee Partners' wholly owned subsidiary Commbroker, Inc. who did business
under the name Re/Max Commercial Brokerage. Its just amazing what comes out...
When the Commbroker offices were closed Kelli Todd was selling off office furniture for pennies to her boyfriend Lorne
Wallace
at Lone Wolf Real Estate Technologies and also to her employees; then she
claimed bankruptcy! Interesting way to do business... you don't pay your
creditors and behind their back you sell your office furniture to your boyfriend and your employees
for pennies!
Apparently no appraisal was done on anything that was sold and prices like 20 bucks were put
on some things... like the things sold to Lorne. The trustee asked
her specifically about appraisals of the merchandise before sale - she had none. So... no one has an idea what the stuff was honestly worth
or even an honest accounting of what was really there.
Apparently Ms. Todd left some important things out when she filed the bankruptcy petition
- the trustee has asked her to amend it and correct it. Truthfully, no one could write a story like this.
MORE LAWSUITS
More 'alleged' 'fraud comes to light.... some old
woman gets bilked out of OVER THREE MILLION DOLLARS in CASH by one of
Commbroker's agents and the supervising broker apparently was not watching!
With all these lawsuits I would have to think about ever trusting anyone at this
company (this is a good lesson - don't trust anyone at face value).... simply amazing! Download and read these amazing lawsuits...
the RESVINI lawsuit is a good one! Of
course companies as well as people are innocent until proven guilty. These are
things a typical consumer would NEVER know or be made aware of... just think
THREE MILLION DOLLARS LOST!
I was pondering this lawsuit. Isn't it amazing that something like this
could take 7 years! I was talking to my attorney about the length of this
lawsuit... he said his longest case was 16 years. Holy Cow! Just think... Kelli
could have SETTLED this for pennies in the very beginning yet she allowed it to
continue year after year causing so much harm to All Cities Realty®
and all her own agents as well; placing them in
jeopardy for so many years now with no end in sight... very sad for everyone
involved. That is my opinion at least. You have to wonder why people do the
things they do.... to me, this one is a big head scratcher...
Maybe someone should have told her that both GOODYEAR and MICROSOFT both lost
similar cases. GoodYear "Big Foot" and Microsoft "Explorer". Two well known
similar trademark cases.
Its a good lesson for all... I can remember the day that Kelli's
in-house attorney basically laughed in my first attorney's face when he was told
All Cities Realty®
was going to sue. The arrogance... now he too is facing legal
action and I believe its possible that he could have his license revoked as an
end result. The laws on broker responsibility are clear. If you are the
designated corporate broker you have significant responsibility. You should
familiarize yourself with
Holly v.
Crank.
Every warrior should be familiar with The Art of War
(Chinese: 孫子兵法; pinyin: Sūn Zǐ Bīng Fǎ) is
a Chinese military treatise that was written during the 6th century BC by
Sun Tzu.
Composed of 13 chapters, each of which is devoted to one aspect of warfare, it
has long been praised as the definitive work on military strategies and tactics
of its time. Before you invade someone's space you need to know your enemy...
The Art of War is one of the oldest and most successful books on military
strategy in the world.
Now that Kelli Todd is filing bankruptcy on her companies like Commbroker
it will be the agents who are again left holding the bag... because it appears
they will be responsible for the trademark violations when the dust settles....
It appears that the Hollymax/Commbroker Action will be consolidated now
with our original action. It appears that Judge Stotler wants to hear both cases
together... and to that we say YAHOOOOOOOOOO!!! The sooner the better!
The following people (except for Commbroker, Inc.) will be most likely be
consolidated into the first lawsuit. At this time the trial date is September
15, 2009. This makes the stakes much higher for Kelli and
all the agents listed
below - their trial will come much sooner than expected - and who knows if
Kelli, the way things are going, will have any money to defend them
or to pay a judgment . (Kelli Todd
personally won't be a part of the trial - there has been no court decision on
her Alter Ego liabilities yet.. she will only be there as an officer of the
corporations)
2008 New "revised" Federal Complaint
against -
HOLLYMAX REALTY, INC., a California corporation, COMMBROKER, INC. a California
corporation; KENNETH G. SETTLED, FARZAD ANDY DORRANI, ALLEN JACKSON, ARIANNE KAYS,
JEANETTTE SETTLED, (JULIA) JIAO HONG SETTLED, ROB O’SETTLED, SHANNAN
O’SETTLED, COLETTE STEVENS, SUSAN SETTLED, OMID BENJAMIN SETTLED, GLEN SETTLED,
MAURICE SETTLED, NINA SETTLED, MATTHEW SETTLED, JACK KHALILI, JIHAN KIM, ROBERT
SETTLED, GINA SETTLED, SIMON SHAHERI, BYRON SETTLED, JR., DALE A. SETTLED, KELLI TODD-AMUNDSON aka KELLI TODD
Comment added
February 24, 2009
Isn't FREE SPEECH a great thing! The Internet
and blogging has exposed so many things that used to happen behind closed doors
that you would never be privy to... as long as people are honest in their
blogging its a useful source of information. Before 1995 I could have never been
able to get my side of the story out to whoever wanted to read it. Free Speech
is truly one of our greatest assets here in the USA!
This lawsuit carnival never ceases to amuse...
During the hearing in 2006 to stay the State Court lawsuit until the
Federal lawsuit was completed.... David Sandelands, Kelli Todd's own Remax
attorney, got up to argue his point in front of the State Count judge... While
trying to make his point to the judge to stay the case he said, to my
recollection, these words... "Your Honor, if CF [Remax] is
found guilty [in the federal case] then they [the 1695 agents] are all guilty."
This was the BIG point to the judge telling him that he needs to let the
federal case go first, and stay the State lawsuit. I was there in the courtroom
and this was my big AH HA! Their own attorney says if Remax is guilty then they
are all guilty... that was a BINGO for me and I remember that moment well!
Amazing! Now their attorney, the same David Sandelands, is coming to the
Judge in the Federal lawsuit that goes to trial on March 17th... and
he is telling the Judge I [ME] mis-stated the law on my
website when HE is the one who made the statement first! And that is where I got
it from! It was he who made the statement; not me!!! Totally Amazing!
Mr. Sandelands (Remax's magic motion machine) is papering the court with
motion after motion after motion trying to sway the Judge to let him do things
and add witnesses and add evidence at the last minute that he had years to
add.... either this guy is a great lawyer or a bad lawyer I don't know which.
The way he can twist just about everything put in front of him is most
fascinating to me, not a lot of people are so capable of this. In the end
though... the truth is the truth and when you have documents to back up what you
say, court transcripts, photos, emails, and all ingredients that go into a
winning case... the case should be a winner.
Finally we will all get our day in court and that is what our system of
justice is all about.
Comment added
February 10, 2009
Things are HEATING up!
These documents are a great read if you really want to know who you are
working for, or used to work for. We have evidence and documentation to PROVE
everything we say in these documents. There is NO magic here.... just the truth.
Basically David Sandelands (the Re/Max attorney motion machine) has sent a
motion to the court to have the case terminated and that I pay all Re/Max's
attorney fees.... funny though, according to the cases he cites in his motion,
EVERYTHING he falsely accuses me of doing: THEY HAVE
REALLY DONE! It's nothing more than the murder's attorney blaming the
victim and attempting to turn black to white.
The Remax attorney constantly and consistently attempts to twist everything
that is said. Its exhausting just reading his filings let alone refuting his
baseless claims on paper... it can be midnight and he'll claim its daylight...
turning black to white.
The declaration is basically the story of all this, and the truth about the foe
that I am fighting. This document reads like a soap opera with bankruptcies,
convictions, license revocations and all the issues that surround this simple
trademark issue.
Exhibit C - summons -
where they sued me (and my wife) and dropped the case in two weeks...
Exhibits will be added as they are quite long and big downloads. We can
assure you we have exhibits for all that is stated in the declarations above.
This is not finger pointing, the circumstances are true that we point out with
hard copy evidence to back it all up.
Remember when you were a kid? Have you been in an argument with some bully
who calls you names and flicks boogers at you? When you get tired of them and come after them they
scream at the top of their lungs with their arms flailing, start crying, and run
as fast as they can to the teacher. Then they tell the teacher it was YOU who flicked boogers at them and
was YOU
who called them names? Welcome to the Remax Lawsuit Circus!
The motions we are having to deal with are right out of 6th grade. They
are accusing me of being a bully - kind of like the 800 pound gorilla crying
about an ant in her cage...
Now we are getting closer to trial the bully is now running to the
teacher.... you can read for yourself how we have responded to the court. I
would have NEVER thought these things could happen in a federal lawsuit...
astonishing!
These new documents get down to the nitty gritty of who what this Remax is
really made of....
Comment added
February 08, 2009
>>> Less
than
40
days
to trial - Mid March 2009! <<<
Please do the smart thing - protect
yourself - contact an attorney today!
Find out how this will affect you and how to protect yourself!
Thanks to all of you who have called and have offered your help!
Comment added
January 30th, 2009 - 5 minute warning!
More great news! The HOLLYMAX / COMMBROKER case was stayed again and sent
to bankruptcy court. The motions to dismiss by her attorney were VACATED by the
Judge... The judge apparently accepted our amended lawsuit. We are now headed for trial! The Hollymax case has
been stayed and motion to dismiss has been vacated....
We noticed on these fascinating documents that she [Kelli] is selling
furniture to her boyfriend [Loren at Lone Wolf] and her agents at reduced cost
and then not paying her creditors, agents commissions... these are telling
documents with a list of who owes who and who is not getting paid.
Comment added
January 26th, 2009 - Its close to game time!
If you have not heard... the BIG BIG BIG news is Kelli Todd has dissolved
her company Hollymax Realty Inc. and
Kelli Todd HAS ALSO BANKRUPTED REMAX
COMMERCIAL BROKERAGE!!!This is what we warned you about with those flimsy agreements she wanted
you to sign letting her represent you. We predicted this. Better check with your
lawyer... because it could be any day that you get a letter or email that Re/Max
Marquee Partners is bankrupt too! You will be holding the bag...
because no bankruptcy attorney is going to allow a company
to pay for your defense!
Comment added
January 16th, 2009 [Happy New Year!]
With the first trial approaching quickly in EARLY
MARCH we have had many phone calls regarding the lawsuits. Trademarks are
a very serious infringement - Barbie just put Bratz dolls out of business... and
they don't even look alike! ...so this is something you should be concerned
about.
A few commercial agents have also called stating they worked for the
Commercial Division and did not use the All Cities Realty
FYI - Kelli Todd, Holly Thomas and the lawyer,
David Sandelands, don't want you calling us. From what we understand they don't
give you much info or any info for that matter. All I can say about that is that
you may get an email one day like the employees at Lehman Brothers..... "Sorry
we are bankrupt and can't afford to represent you" or something like that.
If you want to keep your head in the sand and
do nothing about your protection that is entirely up to you.
PLEASE DO NOT CALL US FOR INFORMATIONunless you HAVE NOT
signed a representation agreement with your company regarding the lawsuits.
You must contact YOUR attorney supplied to you
by Kelli Todd if you have signed one of their agreements.
PLEASE CALL DAVID
SANDELANDS DIRECTLY he is the attorney who Kelli hired and is
representing you. If Kelli won't even give you your attorney's name you can
reach him at www.cislo.com and look him up.
They don't want you calling us and we have to abide by that unless you DID NOT
sign a representation agreement. If you did not sign the agreement Kelli Todd
handed out then you may freely call us for information.
Comment added
December 23rd, 2008 [Happy Holidays!]
HOLLYMAX REALTY, INC., a California corporation, COMMBROKER, INC. a California
corporation; KENNETH G. SETTLED, FARZAD ANDY DORRANI, ALLEN JACKSON, ARIANNE KAYS,
JEANETTTE SETTLED, (JULIA) JIAO HONG SETTLED, ROB O’SETTLED, SHANNAN
O’SETTLED, COLETTE STEVENS, SUSAN SETTLED, OMID BENJAMIN SETTLED, GLEN SETTLED,
MAURICE SETTLED, NINA SETTLED, MATTHEW SETTLED, JACK KHALILI, JIHAN KIM, ROBERT
SETTLED, GINA SETTLED, SIMON SHAHERI, BYRON SETTLED, JR., DALE A. SETTLED, KELLI TODD-AMUNDSON aka KELLI TODD
Comment added
December 4th, 2008
Copyrights, patents and trademarks are serious business!
Their desperation
[at remax] is getting more obvious. Now they [Kelli Todd and her attorney] are
trying to get rid of our attorney Jeffrey Sax. Must be a good sign that
Jeffrey Sax is a GREAT attorney. Below is the response we had to file in reply to Re/Max
Marquee Partners (Commbroker / Hollymax) dishonest motion. More good reading and
true information regarding the lawsuits. [Their motion to
dismiss our attorney Jeffrey Sax was denied by the court]
Added for clarification. It should be noted that
that, as a result of their motion, Judge Carney apparently did get angry with me for sending
out the settlement letter and trying to settle with the agents. I don't quite understand
that. I do know [my opinion] that what the Defense writes to the Judge is just about anything
they can fantasize about or make up with NO FACTS to back up what they say to
the Judge. I really don't understand why I was admonished by the
Judge. I was called by interested parties and no one that talked to me felt
threatened; it was just the opposite. The law should no be so complex
that one would need to spend $2,000 [with an attorney] just to send a settlement
letter. Just another opinion of course...
What is litigation abuse? It appears
to me [my opinion] in the definition of litigation abuse should be a BIG company who force
small companies to ENDLESSLY litigate, and to spend hundreds if thousands of
dollars defending a blatantly obvious federal trademark. That TOO should be
included in litigation abuse.
Also, my opinion, is that ANY ATTORNEY who partakes in fabricating and delivering consistent, frivolous,
wasteful, COSTLY, motions they can send to a judge [just because they can] then
filing the motion EX/PARTE so its a RUSH with everyone involved, [costing
everyone extra time and money] should definitely be included in litigation abuse. I am
certainly under the impression that ALL court filings, attorneys names and
all court information are PUBLIC INFORMATION unless made not public by the
Judge.
Here I am merely blogging [personally reporting and delivering my opinions] about the news and
important issues and my opinions of fighting California's largest Re/Max in
lawsuits that could have been TOTALLY avoided. If Re/Max wants to put up a blog
and tell their side of the story we would love to hear it!
If you have not heard, a settlement email was sent out the other day to all
agents, All Cities Realty has email address for, involved in these lawsuits .
The email was 100% truthful and had to do with statements made by Kelli Todd to
the court and obvious issues that are taking place right now in these cases. I
simply gave the agents an opportunity to settle and be removed from the case. I really
thought it was a nice gesture on my part.
Apparently Kelli Todd, based on a baseless claim of complete BS, has instructed her attorney to try and
silence my "100% truthful information" to
the agents and people interested in these legal actions! Or its possible her
attorney XXXXXXXXXXXXXX concocted
this entire legal maneuver himself! Of course this is only my opinion.
Its so sad the games these people play!
I will tell you that the email that went out to the agents the other day
is truthful, accurate, and was entirely written by me - Joseph Miner, and then
sent from this website by me. I take full responsibility for telling the truth,
writing and sending the email to the agents; Kelli even gave me most of the email addresses.
Someone has to tell the truth here... it should be noted that my attorney
Jeff Sax NEVER approved the email in question, and the All Cities Realty legal team
referred to is my wife and I --- because she has helped me through so much of this. We
make a great TEAM!
The fact of the matter is you that can't make certain statements like this
and have them go two ways at one time.... You can't be implying to me and the
court that you are broke, and at the same time telling your agents that you will
indemnify your agents and brokers for millions and millions of dollars! Its one
or the other... do you have lots of money hidden away under your mattress, or are
you broke? Nevertheless, to seriously indemnify every agent you would need
$15,000,000 in the bank. I am betting Kelli Todd does not have that amount in
the bank waiting to indemnify her agents.
Of course they don't want the agents to know the truth so they try to
shoot the messenger... ME! There would be the surfacing of some serious concern
--- as they are depending on Kelli Todd's statements as being 100%
true (I believe her statements are just about 100% untrue). Some of the facts
are that
Commbroker has been shutdown, and
Hollymax has been shutdown (all agents gone) and that Kelli has lost about
350 agents to date, and Dunn and Bradstreet keeps sending me credit alerts about
her Company.
I wish the court would force the Todd Family to prove to the agents they
actually have money to indemnify all the 1000+/- agents and just how much have
MONEY they set aside for indemnification? If they are claiming this to the
court, can't the court force her to prove
what she states is true and accurate? They [The Todd Family] have already
informed us and the court they have NO insurance to cover all this!!!
Her attorney XXXXXXXXXXXXXX is more like David Copperfield the magician.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX magically turns borderline lies and false and hollow statements
into unsubstantiated truths to the court!! Of course that is strictly my
opinion from what I have personally witnessed consistently in this litigation.
How can he send these things to a federal judge and not get punished?
Where are the morals and ethics here? Is this what our justice system has turned
into? Can you just lie to a federal judge time after time after time until you
get caught red handed? Like I said; AMAZING! Just my opinion of course...
Its sad they [The Todd Family] do not wish their agents to know the
reality and truth of this situation. The more they keep everyone in the dark the
better it will be for them. Don't you folks know what big companies do? This is
why they never told you about the Federal Lawsuit way back in 2005!
Look at all the companies that have gone down in flames that have not told
the truth... Enron, WAMU, Wachovia, Lehman, Fannie Mae, Freddic Mac.... and the
list goes on and on and on.
Who suffered?... the
employees, the stockholders, the investors - just like the agents and brokers
will suffer here. If the TRUTH had only been told! One can ONLY base appropriate
decisions and actions if one is being told the TRUTH!
People need to take responsibility for their actions.
David... your CISLO work IP is: 209.151.225.66 and we here at ACR are
watching you watch us.
PROOF
Note* don't use the "hidemyass" proxy because it does not work.
Comment added
October 16th, 2008
GREAT NEWS - FEDERAL JUDGE OPENS LAWSUIT!
Hollymax / Commbroker trial moves forward!!!
Federal Judge Cormac J. Carney rules in All Cities Realty's favor!!!
This affects ALL AGENTS AND BROKERS who worked for
Hollymax and Combroker from about May 2005 Read the 2008 FEDERAL LAWSUIT
Comment added
September 5th, 2008
***GREAT NEWS - Judge has directed us to file new motion to open case for
discovery!!! Yahoo!
Oxford Dictionary - Noun - LIE - 1. An
intentionally false statement. 2. A situation involving deception or founded on
a mistaken impression.
American Hertitage - Noun - LIE -
1. A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a
falsehood. 2. Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.
Word of the day #2 - perjury
Oxford Dictionary - Noun - PERJURY -
The offence of deliberately telling an untruth in court when under oath. [or
sworn declaration]
American Hertitage - Noun - - PERJURY -
The deliberate, willful giving of false, misleading, or incomplete
testimony under oath.
Comment added
September 4th, 2008
GREAT NEWS!... Out latest motion which I will post tomorrow has caused
some havoc at Re/Max Marquee Partners in Manhattan Beach California.
Let me tell you its tough fighting the Re/Max Manhattan Beach dark side!
These people are really giving Re/Max a bad name. BS, lies,
untruths, half truths, no truth, hollow misleading statements, all to the federal judge
hearing this case. We had enough of the blatant lies and finally called foul!
Lies are lies, and the truth is the truth, and we have all the exhibits to show
what we say is the truth.
Kelli Todd told the judge in a SWORN declaration that they had
removed our Federal Trademark All Cities Realty
®from all her Family's company websites... just more lies to the court. We showed the
court the truth in our latest motion. She also said that Commbroker, Inc.
(Re/Max Commercial Brokerage) was never made part of the Re/Max All Cities Realty website
it was just a "link" [see below]. Its just an ongoing stream of lies, diversions
and untruths to muddy up water then play hide and evade the from the court
system.
Dealing with these people and their attorney is like entering the Twilight
Zone. Up is down and down is up. We own all three companies, no we don't own
those companies the companies own the companies. Company A owns company B, no
Company B owns Company C which owns Company A and B.... confusing as a game of
3D chess.
THE BIG SHELL GAME!
This is a CONSTANT GAME OF GOTCHA! They lie, we
prove they are liars, GOTCHA! Then they move the shells around again....
they file something and try and confuse the court, we prove they are
liars again, GOTCHA! Welcome
to the Re/Max Lawsuit Carnival!
You will notice their key word "linked". They
try to claim time after time Hollmax and Commbroker were only "linked" like as
"outside" websites. Here is a big fat photo showing Commbroker as
PART of Re/Max All Cities Realty. I don't want to bore you and point out lie
after lie after lie, but here are some simple examples.
For reasons that would benefit her in thes
court cases, Kelli Todd recently stated that NONE her family's companies
were using the All Cities Realty®
name and of course that was just another lie.
Note this page
[Re/Max Commercial Brokerage] was captured before they finally changed this site in late 2007
showing Commbroker Inc. illegally being advertised as one of Re/Max All Cities
Realty's offices. This was another lie.
Pages from www.commericalrealestatela.com
8/29/2008 just a few days ago.
[website taken down 9/4 after we filed the perjury motion]
You will note that magically after filing our motion claiming perjury; the
website is taken down!
[www.commericalrealestatela.com]
WEBSITE HISTORY AS OF 9/4/2008!
Comment added
September 3rd, 2008
NEWS... we will have a great new motion for you to read tomorrow or so.
Tells you what is going on with Commbroker (Re/Max Commercial Brokerage) and
Hollymax (Re/Max Sunset Boulevard / Hollywood Hills) cases.
We were doing some figuring... we estimated that the TODD Family's (Kelli
Todd) ) suite of real estate companies, Commbroker, Hollymax, and Re/Max Marquee Partners,
Inc. have LOST ABOUT 300 AGENTS.. can you believe that... about 300 REAL ESTATE
AGENTS... GONE GONE GONE!
We were thinking the problem might be the management... that is what we
have heard from the street.
300 AGENTS... phew!
Remember what I said about FREE legal representation and
bankruptcy?
Comment added
August 31st, 2008
Actually its no big surprise that Commbroker, Inc. (Re/Max Commercial
Brokerage) and Hollymax, Inc. (Re/Max Sunset Blvd) are evaporating; we know the
reasons for this. Apparently some of the agents are being moved into CF Real Esate Loans, Inc. (Now Re/Max Marquee
Partners). 100s of agents have left the Todd family's suite of
companies in the past two years. We were also notified a while back that DAN
SETTLED, the Executive Vice President, had left the company.
Too bad [for the company] DanSETTLEDis gone. He seemed like one of the
shining stars and a positive influence while at Re/Max All Cities Realty. He
appeared to be one of the few who had a clear view of a genuine moral compass. Because of his prior efforts
to solve this matter we wish Mr.SETTLEDthe best of luck in his new life path.
Comment added
August 28th, 2008
One down and one to go..... News is that Hollymax, Inc. is history (no
working agents) and that Commbroker is NEXT (next month according to Kelli's
court papers)... we are watching as the cookie crumbles.
Remember what I said about FREE legal representation and
bankruptcy?
Comment added
August 25th, 2008
Big news!!! We were notified that ALL REAL ESTATE AGENTS at Hollymax Inc.
is gone gone gone....
Does this mean Hollymax Realty, Inc. has been shutdown? Developing
info....
Comment added
August 18th, 2008
We have motioned the court to reopen the Hollymax Inc. and Commbroker Inc.
lawsuit. Keep abreast as this unfolds - join the
newsletter
for updates. The judge was clear that this case could be revisited if the CF
case as not completed by January 2009. Since that case has been continued by the
courts for the 5th time we believe we will be successful in reopening the this
case. Re-opening the Hollymax / Commbroker case will affect all of the following
companies and people.
Commbroker, Inc. - served
Hollymax Realty, Inc. - served
Brokers of record / designated brokers sued
ByronSETTLEDJr. - served
Dale A. SETTLED - served
Commbroker agents and brokers (to date)
Omid SETTLED - served
Glen SETTLED - served
Maurice SETTLED - served
Nina SETTLED - served
Mathew SETTLED - served
Jack Khalili - served
Jihan Kim - served
Robert SETTLED - served
Gina SETTLED - served
Simon Shaheri - served
Hollymax agents and brokers (to date)
Kenneth SETTLED - served
Farzad Andy Dorrani
- served
Jeanette SETTLED - served
Allen Jackson - served
Ariane Kays - served
JuliaSETTLED(Jiao Hong SETTLED) -
served
Rob O'SETTLED - served
Shannan SETTLED - served
Colette Stevens -
served
Susan SETTLED (Susan
SETTLED)
- served
Comment added July
7th, 2008
Trial postponed. Keep abreast of all three trials and the 1700 agent
litigation against Remax Marquee Partners by subscribing to our new email
newsletter. We will send a short email when developments happen in any of the
three law suits!
Subscribe
Comment added June
15th, 2008
Only about 30 days to trial and we are ready!!!
We have 20 GIGABYTES (thousands and thousands of documents) worth of
infringement data that we have provided to the court. We have entire copies of
all the infringing websites with every agent who has used the trademark
ALL CITIES REALTY®
- basically everyone since 2002. We have working copies of all the Remax ALL
CITIES REALTY websites that we can show the jury on a wall size projector screen
-- even though Re/Max disposed of the evidence and changed their website in
December. We have web page after web page where the agents don't use a Remax. We
have 1000s of emails sent to us by many clients, customers, agents, and vendors
because of the actual confusion. We have a 'willful' use of the name because the
Re/Max management would not give it up even though we kept telling them in
emails and letters from attorneys that the name was trademarked and they could
not use the name.
Trademark law is for the LITTLE GUY. Big guys like this Re/Max can fend
for themselves with unlimited funds to fight things like this lawsuit while
making people's lives miserable -- just as miserable as they have made mine and
my wife's for 6 long years. Just think when the jury hears of the long history
of misdeeds of this Re/Max and its management... bankruptcy, fraud, lies,
kickbacks, lawsuits. Do you think a jury is going to have any sympathy for them?
This Remax has sold 20+ BILLION dollars in real estate using our Trademark.
Would you have sympathy?
In today's OC Register there is a long story about Henry Nicholas III,
Broadcoms's co-founder and a Billionaire who lives in Newport. Well ole Henry is
in BIG BIG TROUBLE (see
smoking gun article) the entire article is fascinating. One thing really
caught my eye though... here is the quote "It goes hand
and hand. If they do one unethical thing, they do another." Sounds
familiar with this Remax does it not? It's a
must read article in the OC Register today. Imagine steering your life so
that in a court case everything you made went down the tube... Henry, the
Billionaire, is going to spend 5-10 years in federal prison. I'll bet on that.
I must reflect back to that day in State Court when Remax's attorney,
David Sandelands, argued to the Judge and said "your
honor, if CF is found guilty -- then they all are guilty" and that is the
reason the Judge stayed the State trial for the 1700 real estate agents who have
been named in that lawsuit.
The law is clearly on our side and we are grateful for that. The hardest
part of litigation today is that it is VERY expensive and it takes forever. You
have to be able to weather the storm until judgment day. Almost six years have
gone by and finally that day has come.
I am sure Re/Max was betting that I would die, run out of money, or would
just give up and go away before we got to court. They bet wrong.
Unfortunately for Re/Max Marquee partners and all its affected agents,
this court battle won't be the last; it will be the first. All we need to prove
in this action is simple Trademark infringement... then
the gates of ETERNAL LITIGATION HELL will open for this Remax, its management,
its companies, and ALL AGENTS who are named in the various legal actions.
People think they can hide their personal wealth behind the corporate
veil, do their mis-deeds, and then not have to pay; they can not... California
is a pro Alter Ego State and we believe that Kelli Todd is a perfect Alter Ego
candidate as the head of her "family business."
Read about ALTER EGO in California: Here is a
quote --- "On the other hand, they have also emphasized that “it would be
unjust to permit those who control companies, to treat them as a single
or a unitary enterprise, and then assert their . . . separateness in order to
commit frauds and other misdeeds with impunity."
Basically this says that if you are a sole-proprietor, you are responsible
for your mis-deeds and you can be sued because of them. Alter Ego means that you
are basically a sole-proprietor with a corporate name that you hide behind, so
if you do bad things behind the corporate name, and are found guilty, you can be
held the same way... personally.
The guy that owns the enormous OLEN properties is being sued Alter Ego to
collect on a huge debt his company won't pay. Here is another fascinating story.
This one is about Igor
M. Olenicoff of OLEN properties.
The rest of the story.... and one last
fascinating article.
Our Trademark
expert, who at one time was an official trademark examiner at the US patent and
trademark office, has set aside the date to fly out all the way from Virginia to
tell the Jury, in plain and simple terms, that we currently have, and
that since it was registered we always have had, a legal, valid, and enforceable Trademark;
simple
as that.
Because Kelli, Bob, Dale, Byron and the agents refused to change the mark after we repeatedly
notified them of it; the infringement will be willful and the damages will be
triple. They will also be responsible for the All Cities Realty
®
attorney fees totaling more than 400k at present.
(see Microsoft ruling below)
As stated by the Judge in
Hollmax / Commbroker case; once we prove the mark is valid and protect-able its
all downhill for Re/Max at that point! If Re/Max does not pay and cover the
damages at trial, we are then forced to go after the agents. At that point both the
1700 agent State and Hollymax / Commbroker Federal cases reopen.
If your name is on this list
LIST OF AGENTS SUED
then that would (unfortunately) be you. It is significantly in your favor
that Kelli Todd-Amundson and Bob Todd not lose this case, or for Re/Max Marquee
Partners Inc., Hollymax Inc., and Commbroker Inc. to settle the case before
trial. All the agents who have infringed will see, when this Re/Max files for
bankruptcy protection once again, that the piece of paper you signed allowing
them defend you and indemnify you will be WORTHLESS (I tried to warn
you). Of course this won't affect them personally you know, as they keep
everything worth anything outside of the corporation.
When they, this Re/Max, does lose then the
Pandora's box of legal action will open for evermore. Just first appearance
fee to try and defend all of you agents in State Court is more than $600,000.
A $525 per
person State Court Appearance fee. But defense will not be the issue, once
trademark infringement is found in federal court; its just the damages that will
be the issue in court at that time. If they claim bankruptcy again like they
have in the past when the real estate market slowed down it will be one big nightmare for every
real estate agent who has worked
there and used our registered trademark - All Cities Realty
®
- it will probably go on for years and years and years. All these damages, fees,
and costs add up to millions of dollars real quick.
Our new All Cities Realty website for our NetAgent®
program is coming along nicely and we have significant interest from potential
agents. www.allcitiesnetagent.com
(even DanSETTLEDtold me in person that this was a great idea).
If I was Re/Max Marquee Partners I would be just a little more than
concerned about this, and so should each and every agent and past agent who is
named in the lawsuit (of course that will be updated as agents are STILL using
our trademark). I am not a
Martyr, I admit my wrong doings and don't do things like this. The clock is
ticking... but the window of opportunity is open only for a short time before its too late.
These rulings are NEW and that is because the Internet is new. It has
taken years to get these cases through the court system so case law is just
coming in. But with each and every
ruling our case gets stronger and stronger and stronger.
2007
US App LEXIS 29871 (9th
Cir 2007). Decided December 28, 2007
Ruling: Atrademark
registration is prima facie evidence of the validity of a trademark
and whether defendant has used the mark on the goods specified in the
registration is irrelevant in establishing Plaintiff’s protectable interest.
If there is a protectable interest, the next question is whether Defendant’s
use of the mark creates a likelihood of confusion.
Prima Facie evidence means that the mark is VALID just because we have the
registration and the USPTO issued the trademark to us.
We have had lots of confusion, 1000s of emails (did I say 1000s?) lots of phone
calls, mail you name it.... lots of actual confusion. How about
www.allcitiesrealty.com and
www.allcitiesrealty.net or how
about www.allcitiesescrow.com and
www.allcitiesescrow.net ?? Are
those confusing? Of course they are. They have registered and used both
allcitiesrealty.net and allcitiesescrow.net causing significant confusion. No
one we have talked to does not believe that Re/Max All Cities Realty and All
Cities Realty®
are confusing names.
Then when we prove its willful its 3 times the damage.
Check this recent 9th Circuit Count Ruling regarding as to how simple this is.
Microsoft was granted 3 separate default judgments for trademark and copyright
infringement lawsuits brought in California since March 2008.
(more…)
Microsoft was granted 3 separate default judgments for trademark and
copyright infringement lawsuits brought in California since March 2008. In
all three cases, Microsoft alleged that it had informed the defendants of the
violations and the violations continued - making the infringements willful (and
hence enhancing the statutory damages).
When willful its up to three times the damages and also attorney fees.
Significantly increasing the size of the judgment.
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25726 (9th Cir. 2007). Decided November 5, 2007
Ruling: Because of the way internet search engines interpret
text, the mark “Perfumebay” and “Perfume-bay” infringe and dilute the mark
“eBay”. However, the mark Perfume Bay does not.
(more…)
In this case just the ebay in www.perfumebay.com
was found to be infringing. You will note there is NO more
www.perfumebay.com that name is GONE
and they have lost even on appeal.
Comment added May 1st, 2008
Amazing! After close to 6 years of trying to create an umbrella name,
first using All Cities Realty, and now Marquee Partners this Remax finally got
it right. They finally changed the name of the Corporation to Re/Max Marquee
Partners, Inc. and can now have DBAs that fall under that name. However, the
damages are still damages and the trial is slated for July 15th.
DaleSETTLEDforced Re/Max to get him his own attorney at their expense. I
am wondering why the other agents have not obtained an attorney that would best
represent them? It should be interesting how this all plays out. There is not a
single person we have talked to that does not believe that Re/Max All Cities
Realty and All Cities Realty are confusing names and marks.
You might ask Remax mangement why they are putting all their past agents
at risk and where is the money to pay for a $15,000,000 damage award? If they
don't have the money, all the agents and past agents are still on the hook....
Its not too late, if you have information that may help us at trial we'd
love to hear it. Please give us a call at 213-623-5700 and ask for Jeff Sax.
Sorry, if you are represented by an attorney in this case Mr. Sax can not
ethically talk with you.
Comment added April 13th, 2008
Trial July 2008 - its almost showtime!
Once we prove confusion we immediately reopen 1700 agent State litigation.
We have now included all three corporations and all agents in the legal
actions now. We have have the Trademark and we have actual confusion and we
can't wait for our day in court!
Still NO Department of Real Estate license
for
Re/Max Marquee Partners Why? Are you using this name illegally?
Comment added February 21st, 2008
New federal lawsuit filed on 2/21
Hollymax Realty, Inc., [Re/Max Sunset Blvd] along with certain agents and brokers.
Commbroker Inc. [Re/Max Commercial Brokerage] along with certain agents and brokers.
Serious things you might think about... your
defense.
With our federal trademark trial set for January 2008 apparently Kelli
Todd-Amundson and DanSETTLEDplanned to change this Re/Max from Re/Max All
Cities Realty to Re/Max
MarqueePartners in
an "attempt" to wash their hands of the trademark infringement just prior to the
federal trial... kind of like a big corporate "hit and run" don't you think?
Obviously this trademark infringement [alleged] was one MAJOR corporate boo boo.
Instead of arrogantly continuing the damage for more than FIVE YEARS as they
have, the honorable thing to do would have been to change the name [a long time
ago] and settle the lawsuit so the 1700+ agents are not at risk.
We are looking at two trials. The first will be the Corporation CF Real
Estate Loans, Inc. and the second trial will be the 1700+ agents who used the
name, this includes Commbroker, Hollymax and the agents of Commbroker and
Hollymax as they were displayed on the Re/Max All Cities Realty website and who
were infringers.
David Sandelands, Re/Max All Cities Realty's trademark attorney, was able
to get the state court stayed [paused] until the federal trial has been
completed. I was there in court and will never forget his "argument" to the
judge. Basically he said - Your honor, if CF is found guilty in the federal
trial, then THEY ARE ALL GUILTY.... referring to the agents. With that,
the judge stayed the trial until the federal trial is complete.
To me, spending ALL THAT MONEY to change the name of all the offices, the
signage, the stationary, all the websites - etc, from Re/Max All Cities Realty
to Re/Max MarqueePartners, just before
trial looks to me like Re/Max was/is not so sure about winning as Kelli
Todd-Amundson boldly stated when this first started...
So what happens if this Re/Max goes bankrupt again or has no money to
indemnify the agents [past and present] after the FIRST trial? The agents are
part of the second trial. If we get a good judgment in the first trial the
company may attempt to go bankrupt to avoid paying. If so, how are they going to
pay for the agents legal representation OR indemnify them against judgment with
NO money? Its OK for us if they do go bankrupt as we will just move on to the
second lawsuit and sue the agents.
The lawsuit has now been reset for July 2008. We HOPE the agents are
asking these IMPORTANT questions. Big signs, big offices and fancy cars don't
mean a deep corporate pocketbook. It often depends on where the owner wishes to
place the money... keep it in the company or move it to other ventures or to
their pockets.
Agents should know that owners of corporations like this, in preparation
for financial catastrophe, may CHOOSE to take all the money OUT of the
Corporation and put it in their own pockets to show the company has no money,
but that is a story for another day. BEWARE as the day of trial comes closer
this Re/Max could CHOOSE to file bankruptcy once again - now where would that
leave all these 1700 real estate agents they promise to indemnify? Promises
won't protect you.
It took them, this Re/Max, 64 months +/- to decide to start changing the
name. Apparently keeping this name any longer was not a good idea.
The agents should know that NO SETTLEMENT has taken
place and both court actions are still pending - the corporation, and 1700
agents are STILL being sued. The trial date comes closer and we are
all going to see each other in court very soon. We will be revising our agent
list soon to include all Re/Max agents during the time of infringement.
Interesting that a company would take another company's trademark during
the hottest real estate market on record and then release it after the market
cooled... and just before their court date. No problem for us as we have
gigabytes of data on the infringement and they a a long long long way from a no
infringement situation. There are 1000s and 1000s of links and stories and
agents links and pages on the net that they will never be able to change. Re/Max
MarqueePartners is still a long
way from a name change and a point of non-infringement.
Also I find it peculiar how many legal infringements this goliath Re/Max
company can rack up.... According to the Department of Real Estate website they
don't even have a real estate license for the new name Re/Max
MarqueePartners.
No California Real Estate License for Re/Max Marquee Partners! [as of
12/19/07] If they started this name change WAY back in November you would
think they would have a real estate license prior to using the name and
having all their agents advertise Re/Max Marquee Partners when the DRE has
not issued a license under Re/Max Marquee Partners name.
CLICK
HERE --
PDF
This stuff just amazes me - can you believe it?
We are ELATED however that Kelli Todd and DanSETTLEDhave finally given
the order to stop using our trademarked name ALL CITIES REALTY®.
What took so long?
Comment added October 19th, 2007
This website was erected to combat the purported and alleged lack of information
provided by CF Real Estate Loans, Inc. to its Re/Max agents regarding a legal
action concerning the federal and state trademarks being used by them which were
and are legally registered by ALL CITIES REALTY, Inc.
CF Real Estate Loans Inc., Kelli Todd-Amundson, Bob Todd, their staff, and
associated companies were (are) promoting the use of the ALL CITIES REALTY®
name, and the ALL CITIES REALTY® mark to its agents.
According to agents we spoke with, they had no knowledge of the allegations and
litigation and were told to use the mark by this Re/Max organization, its staff
and owners; further damaging All Cities Realty, Inc. That, of course, does not
indicate that all agents did not know that the mark was registered by All Cities
Realty, Inc. and was the subject of litigation.
We believe that all agents and associated brokers, past and present, are
personally guilty of trademark infringement as independent contractors. This is
why this website was constructed; on our information and belief that all have
used the mark and are guilty of trademark infringement. Whether they still work
there or not; they are guilty of harm to us and the site was constructed for
informational purposes.
The website grew to effectively tell the entire David vs. Goliath story of
a small company with vision and a big dream, A company who's dream was later
destroyed by the actions of one of the planet's largest real estate franchises.
This situation started way back in August 2002. We believe that CF, it's
associated companies, its principles and agents have knowingly, willfully, and
maliciously seized our federal trademark and it began many many years ago.
As the story unfolded it was found by All Cities Realty that Re/Max All
Cities Realty, its owners, its founder, its prior and current associated
companies had 100s of lawsuits, the founder and many persons from the company
had been convicted of federal loan fraud involving both the real estate company,
the agents, and their escrow company. We found that the owners and others had
used bankruptcy laws to rid them and the company of debt while they brag how
successful they are.
Because of their immense power and arrogance, this enormous company then
forced a single individual, Joseph Miner, and his small company All Cities
Realty, Inc., to defend his trademark and spend literally 100s of thousands of
dollars in legal fees, an enormous amount of money to most individuals, all the
while CF Real Estate Loans Inc. [Re/Max All Cities Realty [ now Re/Max
marqueepartners ]] promoted the
use of the mark to their army of 700 agents, named their franchises using the
mark, and published 1000s of pages of web information knowing another company,
All Cities Realty, Inc. was the owner of the registered trademark.
Hypothetically, if the Re/Max All Cities Realty [ now Re/Max
marqueepartners ]'s defense
costs were equal to Mr. Miner's cost to save his registered trademark, their
cost, based on the 700 agents they claim, would be in the vicinity of
$210,000,000 (two hundred ten million dollars)!. An amount we doubt they could
have spent and in this respect the justice system is unfair. The effective cost
for Re/Max All Cities Realty [ now Re/Max
marqueepartners ] is a mere
$400+/- per person [estimated].
With all this said, we at All Cities Realty are committed to this! ALL
CITIES REALTY, Inc. will take this to the end because we are morally right and
legally right and we can't wait for our day in federal and state court to prove
it. We are doing it for the little guys of this world so that case law states
these big companies can not just slap a "house mark" in front of a registered
mark and seize the mark as Re/Max has done.
We wonder how eagerly CF and the Todd's would have seized our name if they
knew it would have cost them 210 million dollars to defend it? Our logic tells
us that would have never touched it.
We are lucky that we have the money to defend our legal rights, typically
there is no free defense or contingency attorneys available to small business.
This is the reason a typical jury slams the big company in situations like this.
We are truly David and they are Goliath.
Why we sued the agents. One prominent reason is that we believed (and it
was indicated to us) the parent company, CF Real Estate Loans, Inc., at trial as
one of its defenses may blame it on its agents, indicating they are independent
contractors and should have known not to use the trademark of another company
and they should make their own decisions. With that knowledge were also forced
to sue all agents that we believed used the name for whatever reason. Although
we have not named many of the newer agents, if their name or photo shows up
under our mark All Cities Realty,
as in this PDF file of their website, they will be added to the State Case
when it proceeds, or if we believe they have used the name in any way that
infringes on our rights or dilutes our name. We understand many of the agents
don't believe they have used the mark; we believe we can show they have, and we
will continue with the lawsuit against the agents immediately when Re/Max is
found guilty.
How your name got on our list - We
obtained your name through the discovery that Re/Max provided us in the form of
the "agent roster" starting in 2002 when this first began, through the time the
legal action was initiated. We compiled ALL names from three reliable sources:
1. the agent roster provided by Re/Max All Cities Realty [ now Re/Max marquee partners ], 2. the
Department of Real Estate list of agents, and 3. the Re/Max All Cities Realty [
now Re/Max marquee partners ] own website
that displayed the agents names prior to the State legal action. There are NO
fictitious names as Kelli Todd-Amundson states, these are sources for the
defendant real estate agent names.
NOTE - anyone we can name, that we believe has harmed us, that has not
been named, will be named, when the state lawsuit resumes. For example, if your
photo and name appears under our mark "All Cities Realty" as in a situation such
as this
as in this PDF file of their website you will be named when the state legal
action resumes. Just because you have not been served to date does not mean we
will not name you and serve you when the time is appropriate.
NOTE - Please do not be angry at All Cities Realty or Joseph Miner for
this!!!! We were happily working along when Re/Max seized OUR NAME. We are only
protecting our mark as Re/Max would do. If Kelli Todd would have stopped using
OUR NAME this would not have happened. Believe me, if we named our company All
Cities Realty - Real Estate Maximums, or ACR
REMAX, you can bet Re/Max
international would sue us. We asked the management at Re/Max All Cities Realty
to quit using our name many times. It did not have to come to this. If you are a
real estate agent you are named because, as real estate agents, you are
independent contractors, and you are responsible for the decisions you make.
Their attorneys inferred to us they may blame this whole thing on you. Whether
you no longer work there is of no consequence - if you have worked there during
the time of infringement which continues today - you will be named if we feel
you have damaged us.
Complain to your management and ownership at Hollymax
Realty, Inc., Commbroker, Inc. and CF Real Estate Loans, Inc. - and all the
fictitious names they go by - please do not complain to All Cities Realty, Inc.
This site is based on the facts that have been uncovered in the
investigation of this situation and although there is some commentary made;
mostly facts are presented for you to base your own opinion. Our objective is
only to bring the truth into the open and make the information available to
interested parties. The site contains our story, commentary, and our
investigation of the Goliath we are fighting and the owners who make its
decisions.
To date we have uncovered court convictions related to real estate, 100s
of lawsuits, articles about the FBI, kickbacks, loan fraud, broker license
revocation, bankruptcy that have now ALL BEEN ASSOCIATED with our good name ALL
CITIES REALTY. All of this has been brought to light within this website. We are
now informed on who we are fighting, and you can be too.
IF YOU HAVE INFORMATION THAT YOU FEEL MIGHT
BE HELPFUL TO OUR SIDE OF THIS CASE, or any questions that we may answer,
AND YOU ARE NOT OTHERWISE REPRESENTED BY YOUR OWN ATTORNEY please feel free
to contact the attorney who is our point of contact for the State of California
Superior Court and Federal Court action:
PLEASE NOTE - IF YOU ARE
REPRESENTED BY YOUR OWN ATTORNEY YOU NEED TO CONTACT HIM OR HER AND OUR
ATTORNEYS CANNOT ETHICALLY SPEAK WITH YOU.
NOTE - DO NOT consider anything I have said
"legal advice". Please consult an attorney, or several attorneys and do what is
absolutely the best for you. We want you to have the BEST defense in this
situation that you can get.
END OF LETTER
NEW! - Re/Max Beach Cities MEGA FRAUD
Case; the full DRE PDF version -
Click here
Read for yourself the tale of conspiracy and
fraud within the Re/Max Beach Cities Realty organization.
The Department of Real Estate lays out all the mis-deeds of Re/Max Beach Cities
Realty and Bob Todd.
Federal Court indictment and case files
coming soon for public download!
Your personal real
estate reputation is no better than the company your work for!
Current and former office names of Bob
Todd, Kelli Todd and this Re/Max organization in Los Angeles California:
Robert Todd
Robert K. Todd
Bob Todd
Bob K. Todd
Kelli Todd
Kelli Amundson
Kelli Todd-Amundson
Kelli P. Todd
Kelli P. Todd-Amundson
Kelli P. Amundson
Kelli Patrice Todd
Kelli Patrice Amundson
Kelli Patrice Todd-Amundson
CF Real Estate Loans, Inc.
C F Real Estate Loans, Inc.
C.F. Real Estate Loans, Inc.
C. F. Real Estate Loans, Inc.
Cf Acquisition Corporation
Hollymax Realty, Inc.
Combroker, Inc. (old company)
Commbroker, Inc. (new company)
Coastal Financial Real Estate Loans Inc (old company)
Oceanfield Inc (old company)
Security Financial Real Estate Loans Inc (old company)
RE/MAX All Cities Realty
ACTIVE AS OF 10/25/2002
Re/Max Bay Cities Realty
ACTIVE FROM 03/28/1995 TO 04/30/2002
Re/Max Beach Cities Realty
ACTIVE AS OF 07/17/1995
Re/Max Beverly Hills
ACTIVE AS OF 03/12/1997
Re/Max Coast Cities Realty
ACTIVE FROM 03/28/1995 TO 04/30/2002
RE/MAX Commercial Brokerage
ACTIVE FROM 02/27/2004 TO 01/07/2007
RE/MAX Commercial Brokerage
ACTIVE FROM 11/24/1999 TO 02/08/2004
RE/MAX Crestline
ACTIVE AS OF 08/25/2003
Re/Max Estate Properties
ACTIVE AS OF 03/12/1997
RE/MAX Hancock Park
ACTIVE AS OF 10/01/2001
RE/MAX Hollywood Hills
ACTIVE FROM 05/10/2001 TO 01/07/2007
Re/Max Lake Arrowhead
ACTIVE AS OF 03/12/1997
Re/Max Los Angeles
ACTIVE AS OF 03/12/1997
RE/MAX Mountain Resorts
ACTIVE AS OF 07/23/2007
RE/MAX Sunset Boulevard
ACTIVE FROM 05/10/2001 TO 03/09/2005
RE/MAX VIP
ACTIVE FROM 10/25/2002 TO 01/07/2007
Re/Max Westside Properties
ACTIVE AS OF 12/19/1996
Coastal Financial Real Estate Loans
ACTIVE FROM 05/06/1991 TO 10/31/1995
Platinum Realty
ACTIVE FROM 05/22/1992 TO 08/03/1992
Re/Max Beach Cities Realty
ACTIVE FROM 05/30/1984 TO 10/31/1995
Re/Max Of Hermosa Beach
ACTIVE FROM 01/26/1983 TO 06/01/1994
Re/Max Of Manhattan Beach
ACTIVE FROM 01/26/1983 TO 06/01/1994
Re/Max Of Palos Verdes Estates
ACTIVE FROM 04/09/1984 TO 03/20/1989
Re/Max Professionals Realty
ACTIVE FROM 03/20/1989 TO 06/01/1994
Re/Max Westside Properties
A Division of Re/Max Beach Cities Realty
ACTIVE FROM 01/26/1995 TO 10/31/1995
RKT Realty
ACTIVE FROM 07/08/1993 TO 10/31/1995
PLEASE NOTE - IF YOU ARE
REPRESENTED BY YOUR OWN ATTORNEY YOU NEED TO CONTACT HIM OR HER. OUR
ATTORNEYS CANNOT ETHICALLY SPEAK WITH YOU WHILE YOU ARE REPRESENTED.
IF YOU
HAVE INFORMATION THAT YOU FEEL MIGHT
BE HELPFUL TO OUR SIDE OF THIS CASE, or any questions that we may answer,
AND YOU ARE NOT OTHERWISE REPRESENTED BY YOUR OWN ATTORNEY please feel free
to contact the attorney who is our point of contact for the State of California
Superior Court and Federal Court action: